NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Victor Hammond bht Glenn Hammond v Elpat Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 1972 Hearing dates: 20 June 2018 Date of orders: 20 June 2018 Decision date: 20 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Rein J Decision: See [19] – [21] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Interim preservation – Mareva Orders – General principles – Whether the Plaintiff has demonstrated a good arguable case on a justiciable cause of action – Mareva Order not granted. Cases Cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 Dimitrovski v Australian Executor Trustees Limited [2014] NSWCA 68 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 Linprint Pty Ltd v Hexham Textiles Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 508 Ninemia Maritime Corporation v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG 'The Niedersachsen' [1983] 1 WLR 1412; [1984] 1 All ER 398 Samimi v Seyedabadi; Seyedabadi v Samimi [2013] NSWCA 279 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Victor Hammond bht Glenn Hammond (First Plaintiff) Goldorb Corporation Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Elpat Pty Limited (First Defendant) Brisbane Project Management Services Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Property Listing Services Pty Limited (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T. Lynch SC and R. K. Weaver (Plaintiffs) J. T. Buncle (Defendants)
Solicitors: Brook Worthington Solicitors (Plaintiffs) Legend Legal Group (Defendants) File Number(s): 2017/00294038 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate