NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Latu [2018] NSWSC 1659 Hearing dates: 29 October 2018 Date of orders: 29 October 2018 Decision date: 01 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: The tendency and relationship evidence in issue is admitted. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – tendency evidence – admissibility of tendency evidence in a murder trial – accused not yet arraigned before a jury panel – death by blunt force trauma to head of deceased – whether foreshadowed tendency evidence passes tests in ss 97 and 101 Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 55, 97, 101, 135, 137 Cases Cited: DAO v R (2011) 81 NSWLR 568; [2011] NSWCCA 63 Gardiner v R (2006) 162 A Crim R 233; [2006] NSWCCA 190 HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334; [2008] HCA 16 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 264 A Crim R 225; [2017] HCA 20 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52 Mol v R [2017] NSWCCA 76 Norman v R [2012] NSWCCA 230 R v Clark (2001) 123 A Crim R 506; [2001] NSWCCA 494 R v Ford (2009) 201 A Crim R 451; [2009] NSWCCA 306 R v Hamoui (No 1) [2005] NSWSC 99 The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a pseudonym) [2018] HCA 40 Velkaski v R (2014) 45 VR 680; [2014] VSCA 121 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Onitolosi Etuini Atiai Latu (Accused) Representation: Counsel: G Newton (Crown) G Woods QC (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate