NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Gorji Property Investment Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 1671 Hearing dates: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: The creditor's statutory demand dated 2 May 2018 issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff is set aside. The Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – application to set aside creditor's statutory demand under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459H – where serious question to be tried as to whether the terms of the mortgage under which the debt is claimed could be found to be unconscionable – whether a genuine dispute has been established –whether condition should be imposed on an order setting aside the demand under Corporations Act s 459M. Legislation Cited: - Australian Consumer Law - Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12CC - Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 127, 459H, 459M Cases Cited: - Britten-Norman Pty Ltd v Analysis & Technology Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 344; (2013) 85 NSWLR 601 - Get'm Pty Ltd v Triulcio [2004] NSWSC 291 - Ipstar Australia Pty Ltd v APS Satellite Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 15 - Knight Frank Australia Pty Ltd v Paley Properties Pty Ltd [2014] SASCFC 103; (2014) 120 SASR 532 - Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2015) 236 FCR 199 - Panel Tech Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd v Australian Skyreach Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2003] NSWSC 896 - Re Erma Properties Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1748 - Re Wabbits Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 532 - Re Wollongong Coal Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1680; (2015) 110 ACSR 134 - Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 681; (1997) 76 FCR 452 - TR Administration Pty Ltd v Frank Marchetti & Sons Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 70; (2008) 66 ACLR 67 - The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd v Romeo (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 347 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gorji Property Investment Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Nu Horizon property Holdings Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M W Young SC (Plaintiff) D Pritchard SC/W J Nathan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate