NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Azari (No 7) [2018] NSWSC 1680 Hearing dates: 3, 4 and 7 October 2018 Date of orders: 08 October 2018 Decision date: 02 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: N Adams J Decision: The telephone intercept evidence comprised of calls 5, 15, 39 and 201 are inadmissible. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Admissibility – Where Crown seeks to adduce evidence of third-party telephone conversations to which the accused was not party – Whether evidence relevant – Whether evidence inadmissible hearsay Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 2005 (Cth), Sch, s 101.6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 59 ,60 ,66A, 81, 87, 184 Cases Cited: Ahern v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 87; [1988] HCA 39 Decision Restricted [2018] NSWCCA 127 R v Azari (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 515 R v Clark (2001) 123 A Crim R 506; [2001] NSWCCA 494 Tripodi v The Queen (1961) 104 CLR 1; [1961] HCA 22 Tsang v R (2011) 35 VR 240; [2011] VSCA 336 Wing Cheong Li v R (2010) 199 A Crim R 419; [2010] NSWCCA 40 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Omarjan Azari (Accused) Representation: Counsel: L Crowley with B Power (Crown) B Hughes SC with M Curry (Accused)
Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Ryan & Payten Criminal Specialists (Accused) File Number(s): 2014/274649 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate