NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Beavis v R [2018] NSWCCA 248 Hearing dates: 7 September 2018 Date of orders: 07 November 2018 Decision date: 07 November 2018 Before: Ward JA; Bellew J; Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. Leave be granted to raise ground 2 of the appeal against conviction and dismiss the appeal against conviction. 2. Leave be granted to raise ground 1 of the appeal against severity of sentence and the appeal be allowed. 3. Set aside the sentence imposed by Bright DCJ on 8 December 2017. 4. In lieu thereof: (a) impose an aggregate sentence of 7 years commencing on 7 December 2017 and expiring on 6 December 2024; (b) pursuant to s 44(2A) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) set a non-parole period of 4 years and 2 months commencing 7 December 2017 and expiring 6 February 2022; (c) specify that the earliest date the applicant will be eligible to be released on parole is 6 February 2022; (d) pursuant to s 53A(2)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), indicate to the appellant and record that an aggregate sentence is imposed and that the sentence that would have been imposed for count 1 on the indictment is 9 months' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 5 months; for count 2 on the indictment the sentence that would have been imposed is 2 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 3 months; for count 3 on the indictment the sentence that would have been imposed is 4 years and 3 months' imprisonment; for count 4 on the indictment the sentence that would have been imposed is 2 years and 6 months' imprisonment; and for count 5 on the indictment the sentence that would have been imposed is 3 years and 3 months' imprisonment. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against conviction – whether a miscarriage was occasioned by misdirection to the jury regarding evidence given on oath by the appellant – whether verdict of jury unreasonable – leave refused to raise first ground – leave granted to raise second ground but held verdict was not unreasonable – appeal against conviction dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate