NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DPO v Children's Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 258 Hearing dates: 25 October 2018 Date of orders: 07 November 2018 Decision date: 07 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: The applicant's application for a stay of the determination of the Children's Guardian is dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Child Protection – Where applicant a disqualified person by reason of a manslaughter conviction over 30 years ago - Application for a stay of determination that applicant be refused a working with children check clearance Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Child Protection (Working with Children) Regulation 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: CZI v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 179 New South Wales Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: DPO (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Dart (Respondent)
Solicitors: Applicant in person Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00320624 Publication restriction: Orders have been made pursuant to s 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
REASONS FOR DECISION 1. The applicant applied to the Tribunal for an order enabling him to work with children, and also for a stay of the determination of the Children's Guardian not to grant him a clearance. This decision concerns his stay application. 2. I have decided not to grant the stay, because the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to displace the presumption that he is a risk to children.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate