NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fell v Chenhall [2018] NSWCA 260 Hearing dates: 5 and 7 November 2018 Date of orders: 07 November 2018 Decision date: 07 November 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA; Barrett AJA Decision: The Notice of Motion for a stay and Summons seeking leave to appeal is each dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal against interlocutory ruling in Local Court summary criminal proceedings – interpretation of r 8.7(4) of Local Court Rules 2009 (NSW) – leave refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 53(3) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 175(3)(d), 179 Local Court Rules 2009 (NSW), r 8.7(4) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2) Cases Cited: Emanuele v Australian Securities Commission (1997) 188 CLR 114; [1997] HCA 20 Knaggs v Director of Public Prosecution (NSW) [2007] NSWCA 83; (2007) 170 A Crim R 366 Sharman v Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] NSWSC 135; (2006) 161 A Crim R 1 Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2018] NSWCA 253 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Simon Mark Fell (Applicant) Jennifer Chenhall (First Respondent) Local Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Pararajasingham (Applicant on 5 November 2018) I McLachlan (Applicant on 7 November 2018) M Swift (First Respondent on 5 November 2018) N D Funnell (First Respondent on 7 November 2018)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate