NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aldous v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 261 Hearing dates: 29 August 2018 Date of orders: 09 November 2018 Decision date: 09 November 2018 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; Payne JA at [3] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed.
(2) The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW – disability compensation under Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 – procedural fairness – whether self-represented litigant denied procedural fairness
EQUITY – disability compensation under Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 – unconscionability - whether conduct of NSW Police in enforcing Deed unconscionable – whether NSW Police owed appellant a fiduciary duty – whether breach of fiduciary duty
TORTS – disability compensation under Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 – whether NSW Police owed appellant a duty of care – whether breach of duty of care
CONTRACTS – disability compensation under Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005 – whether Deed contravened Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 9
Crown Employees (Police Officers Death and Disability) Award 2005, cll 7, 8, 9, 10 Cases Cited: Bauskias v Liew [2013] NSWCA 297 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457; [1998] HCA 66 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14 Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423; [1954] HCA 17 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392; [2013] HCA 25 Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621; [1992] HCA 61 Maund v Crown in right of the State of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 226 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adrian Aldous (Appellant ) State of New South Wales (Respondent) R Perla (Amicus curiae) Representation: Counsel: Appellant (self-represented) P Moorhouse (Respondent) R Perla (Amicus curiae)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate