NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: A Fife & Co Pty Ltd v Pane [2018] NSWDC 332 Hearing dates: 10 September – 12 September 2018 Date of orders: 02 November 2018 Decision date: 02 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Dicker SC DCJ Decision: (1) The Second Further Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed. Judgment for the defendants; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the Second Further Amended Statement of Claim proceedings as agreed or assessed; (3) The Further Amended Statement of Cross-Claim is dismissed. Judgment for the cross-defendant; (4) The cross-claimants/defendants are to pay the cross-defendant's/plaintiff's costs of the Cross-Claim proceedings as agreed or assessed; (5) Liberty to the parties to apply to the court within 14 days for a different costs order to those set out in Orders 2 and 4 above; (6) Exhibits to be returned in 28 days. Catchwords: Torts – negligence – property damage claim to motor vehicles arising from motor vehicle accident – quantum not in issue – liability in issue – different factual accounts – whether liability can be determined on the evidence Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Boateng v Dharamdas [2016] NSWCA 183 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 Davis v Swift [2014] NSWCA 458 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Grills v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 72; Hyjer v Lopes [2018] NSWDC 8 Manley v Alexander [2005] HCA 79; (2005) ALJR 413 Marien v Gardiner (2013) NSWCA 396 Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Cox [2014] NSWCA 328 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] 10 HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALR 529 Rail Corporation New South Wales v Donald [2018] NSWCA 82 Sangha v Baxter [2009] NSWCA 78 Strong v Woolworths Ltd [2012] HCA 5; (2012) 246 CLR 182 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: A Fife & Co Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Nino Pane (First Defendant) Joan Pane (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Stockley (Plaintiff) J Gruzman (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate