NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wise v Barry; The Estate of Robyn Margaret Wise [2018] NSWSC 1726 Hearing dates: 15 – 16 October 2018 Date of orders: 14 November 2018 Decision date: 14 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: Parties to provide the Court with Short Minutes of Order reflecting these reasons. The proceedings will then be adjourned for any argument on costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Executors and administrators — Proceedings against co-executor — Removal sought of the co-executor by another executor to both of whom Probate had been granted — Significant delay in the administration of estate — Defendant executor has not vacated the property which comprises the primary asset of the estate — Possession of real property sought — Occupation fee or mesne profits also sought in amended Summons but not pursued following conclusion of the proceedings
SUCCESSION — FAMILY PROVISION — Claim for a family provision order by Defendant in Cross-Summons — No dispute as to the Defendant's eligibility as a person with whom the deceased was living in a de facto relationship at the time of her death — Proceedings not commenced within time prescribed by Act — No consent to extension of time — Whether sufficient cause shown — Whether conscious and deliberate decision made by Defendant in not commencing proceedings within time — Unconscionable conduct of Defendant — Prejudice suffered by Plaintiff and other beneficiary due to delay in each receiving his entitlement under Will — Competing claim of the Plaintiff and another beneficiary, each of whom is an adult child of the deceased — Small estate in value — Provision made by deceased to Defendant in Will of half of the value of the real estate — Court not satisfied there was sufficient cause shown for the application being made out of time — Conclusion in part on the basis that the Court would not, in any event, have made a family provision order in favour of the Cross-Claimant Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2018 No 4 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Andre v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (as Executor of the Will of Barbara Helen Owen Stewart) [2009] WASCA 14 Bates v Messner (1967) 67 SR (NSW) 187 Butler v Morris; Butler (bht NSW Trustee & Guardian) v Morris [2012] NSWSC 748 Carey v Robson (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 1199 Chan v Chan [2016] NSWCA 222 Chu v Ngar [2015] NSWSC 1505 Cringle v Cringle [2018] NSWSC 1558 Forsyth v Sinclair (No 2) (2010) 28 VR 635; [2010] VSCA 195 Harkness v Harkness (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 35 Hills v Chalk [2009] 1 Qd R 409; [2008] QCA 159 Ilott v The Blue Cross [2017] 2 WLR 979; [2017] UKSC 17 Madden-Smith v Madden (Estate of the late Doris Linda Madden) [2012] NSWSC 146 Mavrideros v Mack (1998) 45 NSWLR 80; [1998] NSWCA 286 Moore v Randall [2012] NSWSC 184 Neale v Neale [2015] NSWCA 206 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Re Salmon, Deceased [1981] Ch 167 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Stone v Stone [2016] NSWSC 605 Thomas v Pickering; Byrne v Pickering [2011] NSWSC 572 Underwood v Gaudron (2015) 324 ALR 641; [2015] NSWCA 269 Valbe v Irlicht [2001] VSC 53 Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Verzar v Verzar (2014) 12 ASTLR 523; [2014] NSWCA 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shane Colin Wise (Plaintiff) Stephen Gregory Barry (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr G Rich (Plaintiff) Mr D Flaherty (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate