NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Roads and Maritime Services v East Coast Wharf Constructions Pty Ltd; Roads and Maritime Services v King [2018] NSWLEC 182 Hearing dates: 9 November 2018 Date of orders: 09 November 2018 Decision date: 12 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Molesworth AJ Decision: See [23]-[24] of judgment Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether leave granted to Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) to institute a prosecution with respect to offences under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act) – RMS "an appropriate regulatory authority" to bring proceedings for the offence – leave granted pursuant to s 219(1A) of the POEO Act Legislation Cited: Marine Safety Act 1998 Pt 6 Div 3 Protection of the Environment Operations (General) Regulation 2009 cl 86 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 ss 115, 143, 144, 169, 217, 219, Sch 1 Transport Administration Act 1988 Pt 6 Cases Cited: Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales; Batistatos v Newcastle City Council (2006) 227 ALR 425 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Proceedings Nos 18/344508, 18/344550, 18/344551 Roads and Maritime Services (Prosecutor) East Coast Wharf Constructions Pty Ltd (Defendant)
Proceedings Nos 18/344555, 18/344556, 18/344557 Roads and Maritime Services (Prosecutor) Benjamin Peter King (Defendant) Representation: COUNSEL: Dr Nick Brunton, Solicitor, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (Prosecutor) N/A (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate