NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Junus v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd;; Junus v Sing Tao Newspapers Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1735 Hearing dates: 9 November 2018 Date of orders: 12 November 2018 Decision date: 09 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: In each proceeding, imputations (a), (b), (e), (f) and (g) are struck out with leave to replead; costs are reserved until the next occasion; leave is granted to the plaintiff to file any amended statement of claim on or before 23 November; both matters adjourned to 30 November 2018 Catchwords: DEFAMATION – imputations – whether reasonably capable of being conveyed Cases Cited: Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd (2005) 221 ALR 186; [2005] HCA 52 Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Ltd (1934) 50 TLR 581 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Proceedings 2018/261141: Harmonnia Junus (plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (defendant)
Proceedings 2018/264372: Harmonnia Junus (plaintiff) Sing Tao Newspapers Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Goodchild (plaintiff in both proceedings) L Barnett (defendant in proceedings 2018/261141) M Richardson (defendant in proceedings 2018/264372) Solicitors: O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors Pty Ltd (plaintiff in both proceedings) Banki Haddock Fiora Lawyers (defendant in proceedings 2018/261141) Canaan Lawyers (defendant in proceedings 2018/264372) File Number(s): 2018/2611412018/264372 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate