NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v HG; R v WE (No 11) [2018] NSWSC 1746 Hearing dates: 20 July 2018 Date of orders: 20 July 2018 Decision date: 20 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [13] Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Public interest immunity claims – Issues of disclosure – Exclusion of evidence of matters of state – Accused charged with committing acts in preparation for a terrorist act or acts – Where disclosure would be of little forensic value to the accused – Where balancing exercise tended against disclosure – Claims for public interest immunity upheld. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cain v Glass (No. 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 230 Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 National Crime Authority v Gould (1989) 90 ALR 489 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 596; (2006) 163 A Crim R 508 R v Meissner (1994) 76 A Crim R 81 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1; [1978] HCA 43 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina – Crown HG – Accused WE – Accused Representation: Counsel: I Bourke SC and R Ranken – Crown B Walmsley QC – Accused HG J Trevallion – Accused WE P Melican - Director General of Security
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) – Crown Birchgrove Legal – Accused HG Alexanders Lawyers – Accused WE Australian Government Solicitor – Director General of Security File Number(s): 2016/3051142016/305103 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate