NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Berry Rural Co Operative Society Ltd v Sepak Industries Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 1751 Hearing dates: 9 November 2018 Decision date: 15 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Plaintiff granted leave to rely on further evidence on terms including as to costs Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings and evidence – amendment – plaintiff seeks leave to amend its pleadings and rely upon further evidence – where plaintiff previously granted leave to rely on evidence served in the face of a guillotine order – where earlier order that if plaintiff in default of any direction or order the proceedings be dismissed – where plaintiff's legal advisors aware that defendants preparing evidence in response – where plaintiff's legal advisors concluded that existing evidence insufficient and required augmentation – where plaintiff's legal advisors did not inform the defendants or the Court that further evidence be marshalled – where significant body of further evidence served without notice on the day after defendants served its evidence – where likely that defendants will have to revisit all evidence adduced so far to ascertain whether it answers evidence freshly served by plaintiff – whether plaintiff should have leave to rely upon the further evidence – whether plaintiff should have leave to amend its pleadings
PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – Lawyers – whether solicitor for plaintiff should pay the costs that the plaintiff must pay the defendants by reason of leave being granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd v Tolfield Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1309 The Berry Rural Co Operative Society Ltd v Sepak Industries Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 298 (No 2) Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Gen 5 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Berry Rural Co Operative Society Ltd (Plaintiff/Applicant) Sepak Industries Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Respondent) Henry Kong (Second Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J P Knackstredt (Plaintiff/Applicant) J C Giles SC (Defendants/Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate