NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rawson v Studholme [2018] NSWSC 1764 Hearing dates: 12 and 13 November 2018 Date of orders: 14 December 2018 Decision date: 14 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraphs [52]-[54] Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – Section 88K Conveyancing Act, 1919 REAL PROPERTY – Section 88K(3) – terms of easement – remedial work REAL PROPERTY – Section 88K(4) – compensation – market value – injurious affectation – blot on title COSTS – Section 88K(5) – unreasonable conduct by defendant – order 'to the contrary' – relevance of special nature of proceedings for order pursuant to Section 88K(1) Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act, 2005 (NSW) Conveyancing Act, 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 Bilton v Ligdas [2016] NSWSC 1585 Donnelly v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] NSWSC 263 Evans v Cornish Nominees Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 1295; (2009) 14 BPR 27257 Gosford Shire Council v Green 48 LGRA 201 Huntsman Chemical v International Pools Australia Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 242 Khattar v Wiese [2005] NSWSC 1014 King v Carr-Gregg [2002] NSWSC 379 Mir Bros Unit Constructions v Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 314 Mitchell v Boutagy [2001] NSWSC 1045 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 445 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 2 Texts Cited: Ipp, Lawyers Duties to the Court, (1998) 114 LQR 63 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Warwick Leslie Rawson – first plaintiff Diana Jane Rawson – second plaintiff Edward John Wilson – third plaintiff Patricia Ann Wilson – fourth plaintiff Carmen Richards – fifth plaintiff Tara Marie Robertson – sixth plaintiff Terence Kenneth Little – seventh plaintiff Lesley Little - eighth plaintiff Sydney Reinhardt - ninth plaintiff Elizabeth Patricia Studholme – defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr P Tomasetti SC with Ms M Carpenter – for the plaintiffs Mr G McNally SC with Ms V Cha – for the defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate