NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Griffin v R [2018] NSWCCA 259 Hearing dates: 3 September 2018 Decision date: 21 November 2018 Before: Beazley P at [1]; McCallum J at [2]; Davies J at [66] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; sentence imposed at first instance quashed and, in substitution therefor, applicant sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for six years commencing on 27 June 2016 with a non-parole period of three years concluding on 26 June 2019 and a balance of term of three years concluding on 26 June 2022. Applicant first eligible for release to parole on 26 June 2019. Catchwords: CRIME – sentencing – whether sentencing judge erred in his approach to the applicant's mental condition – where judge received inadequate assistance from defence counsel on that issue – whether applicant precluded from reformulating his case on that issue in this court – where applicant had presented cogent evidence relevant to his moral culpability and his prospects of rehabilitation Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A(3)(j) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 111(2), 112(2), 114(1)(d), 115, 195(1A)(b) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rodney Griffin (Applicant) Regina Representation: Counsel: S Fraser (Applicant) F Veltro (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate