NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ottoway Engineering Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) v Pooncarie Operations Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1775 Hearing dates: 16 November 2018 Decision date: 16 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Production of the documents sought by the plaintiff allowed (at [17]). Production of the first category of documents sought by the defendant not allowed (at [23]). Production of the second category of documents sought by the defendant allowed (at [27]). Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — notices to produce — where both parties issued notices to produce in respect of pending hearing of an application for security for costs — whether it is "on the cards" that production under notice will materially assist on an identified issue Cases Cited: Alister v R [1984] HCA 85; (1984) 154 CLR 404 Forest Pty Ltd v Keen Bay Pty Ltd (1991) 4 ACSR 107 ICAP Pty Ltd v Moebes [2009] NSWSC 306 Rinehart v Rinehart [2018] NSWSC 1102 Save the Ridge Inc v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] FCA 1289 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (No 2) (1989) 88 ALR 90 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ottoway Engineering Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) (Plaintiff/Respondent) Pooncarie Operations Pty Ltd (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: M Sheldon (Plaintiff/Respondent) P Santucci (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate