NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Young v Cooke (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1787 Hearing dates: 3 October 2017; 25 May and 15 June 2018 (written submissions) Date of orders: 21 November 2018 Decision date: 21 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: The plaintiff shall pay the defendants' ordinary costs of the further amended notice of motion filed on 3 October 2017, as agreed or assessed, payable forthwith. Catchwords: COSTS – security for costs application – general principles – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.1 and 42.7 – whether costs in the cause – defendants' substantially successful – prejudice to the defendants – costs payable forthwith – orders Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allplastics Engineering Pty Ltd v Dornoch Ltd [2006] NSWCA 33 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2003] NSWSC 297 EKO Investments Pty Limited v Austruc Constructions Ltd [2009] NSWSC 371 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 1; [2002] NSWSC 432 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd (2004) 208 ALR 564; [2004] NSWSC 664 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad [2006] NSWSC 88 Knight v Clifton [1971] Ch 700 Lex Fitness Pty Ltd ATF Lex Family Trust v Australian Fitness Management Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 157 Megna v Marshall [2005] NSWSC 1326 MHG Plastic Industries Pty Ltd v Quality Assurance Services Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 821 Moseley v AB (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1812 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Plyable Pty Ltd v Go Gecko (Franchise) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] QSC 256 Richards v Kadian (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 373 Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 Solarus Products v Vero Insurance (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 1012 Tomanovic v Global Mortgage Equity Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 256 Young v Cooke [2018] NSWSC 588 Texts Cited: G E Dal Pont, Law of Costs (Butterworths, 3rd ed, 2013) Category: Costs Parties: Gary Young (Plaintiff / Respondent) Bill Cooke (First Defendant / Applicant on Motion) Helena Cooke (Second Defendant / Applicant on Motion) Representation: Counsel: D Stewart with A Hopkins (Defendants / Applicants on Motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate