NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cabot (a pseudonym) v R [2018] NSWCCA 265 Hearing dates: 12 September 2018 Decision date: 28 November 2018 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; McCallum J at [87]; Bellew J at [88] Decision: 1. Extend the time for the filing of a notice of appeal until 12 July 2018.
2. Grant leave to appeal on ground 1.
3. Refuse leave to appeal on ground 1A pursuant to r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules.
4. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal against conviction – jury returned guilty verdict, but no conviction entered – whether appeal under s 5(1) of Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) available
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against conviction – convictions on two counts of committing acts of indecency on a child – acquittals on other counts – jury unable to reach verdicts on further counts – whether guilty verdicts unreasonable – whether testimonial evidence of young child capable of sustaining jury's verdicts – inconsistencies and gaps in evidence – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 66A, 578A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 5A Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Part 6 Cases Cited: Allan v R [2017] NSWCCA 6 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297; [1981] HCA 26 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293; [1977] HCA 44 Jenkins v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] NSWCA 406 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 56 Lane v The Queen [2018] HCA 28; (2018) 92 ALJR 689 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501; [1996] HCA 46 McCann v R [2014] NSWCCA 79 NH v DPP (SA) (2016) 260 CLR 546; [2016] HCA 33 Obeid v R (2015) 91 NSWLR 226; [2015] NSWCCA 309 Palmer v R [2018] NSWCCA 205 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 53 R v Bonat [2004] NSWCCA 240 R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 487 R v MAJW [2007] NSWCCA 145; (2007) 171 A Crim R 407 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290; 52 NSWLR 82 R v NEK [2001] NSWCCA 392 R v TK (2009) 74 NSWLR 299 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 Tonari v R [2013] NSWCCA 232; (2013) 237 A Crim R 490 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cabot (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate