NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Drivas v Jakopovic [2018] NSWSC 1803 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 21, 22 March 2018; further written submissions ending 13 April 2018 Date of orders: 23 November 2018 Decision date: 23 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: (1) The plaintiff's Amended Statement of Claim dated 27 July 2016 is dismissed. (2) The defendant's Statement of Cross-Claim dated 6 April 2016 is dismissed. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – testamentary capacity – where the deceased excluded her granddaughter from the will – where the deceased suffered from a progressive neurological condition at the time of the will's execution – exclusion based on possible mistaken assumption or false belief – Carr v Homersham [2018] NSWCA 65 considered
SUCCESSION – testamentary capacity – assessment of evidence – expert evidence – weight of expert reports giving evidence on the legal issue of whether the deceased had testamentary capacity
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings and particulars – application to amend statement of claim – proposed claim contingent on the success of the main claim in the proceeding – where proposed claim potentially affects parties not joined in the proceedings – where the relief sought for the proposed claim is narrow – application refused
EVIDENCE – affidavit evidence – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 35.2 – leave to rely on affidavit where deponent could not attend for examination – where deponent hospitalised – opposing party not informed of deponent's unavailability until the commencement of the hearing
EVIDENCE – opinion evidence – expert opinion evidence – doctor's opinion expressed in a medical certificate – basis of the opinion – resort to surrounding evidence to show basis – admissibility Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 64, 79, 80 Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), Part 5 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 41, Chapter 3 Uniform Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), r 35.2 Cases Cited: Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 Carr v Homersham [2018] NSWCA 65 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588; [2011] HCA 21 Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins (2003) 215 CLR 317; [2003] HCA 51 Grey v Australian Motorists & General Insurance Co Pty Ltd [1976] 1 NSWLR 669 Hamilton v Nelson [2012] SASC 219 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352; [2011] HCA 36 Makita (Aust) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Ministry of Health v Simpson [1951] AC 251 Pachkovski v Australian Executor Trustees Ltd [2011] NSWCA 94 Parslow v NSW Land & Housing Corporation; NSW Land & Housing Corporation v Parslow [2018] NSWSC 843 Re Crooks Estate (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J, 14 December 1994) Re Griffith (decd); Easter v Griffith (1995) 217 ALR 284 Worth v Clasohm (1952) 86 CLR 439; [1952] HCA 67 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anita Drivas (Plaintiff) Boris Jakopovic (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Brown (Plaintiff) R Tregenza (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate