NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Telstra Corporation Ltd v Independent Pricing & Regulatory Tribunal [2018] NSWCATAD 269 Hearing dates: 10 October 2018 Date of orders: 26 November 2018 Decision date: 26 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R L Hamilton, Senior Member Decision: (1) Except as to Document 2, the decision of the Respondent is affirmed. (2) Document 2 is remitted to the Respondent to be redacted as set out in paragraph 58 prior to being released to the Applicant. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW- access to government information- general public interest in favour of disclosure of government information- whether the disclosure of the information would contribute to open public debate of government policy- whether disclosure of the information would permit the checking of improper or unlawful activity by government- prejudice to the supply to an agency of confidential information that facilitates the effective exercise of that agency's function- prejudice to the effective exercise by an agency of the agency's functions- disclosure of information provided to an agency in confidence-prejudice to any person's legitimate business, commercial, professional or financial interests-balancing of public interest considerations for and against disclosure. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992 Telecommunications Act (Cth) 1997 Cases Cited: Bayside City Council v Telstra Corporation Limited (2004) 216 CLR 595 Commissioner of Police NSW v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19) Flack v Commissioner of Police NSW [2011] NSWADT 286 Telstra Corporation Limited v Queensland [2016] FCA 1213 Transport for NSW v Searle [2018] NSWCATAP 93 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Telstra Corporation Limited (Applicant) Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M.Sherman (Applicant) D. Birch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate