NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Van Der Borght v Memjet North Ryde Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 346 Hearing dates: 25 October 2018 Date of orders: 27 November 2018 Decision date: 27 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 151D of the Workers' Compensation Act 1987, the plaintiff is granted leave, nunc pro tunc, to file a statement of claim seeking work injury damages from the defendant for injuries he suffered in the defendant's employ between 24 April 2013 and 10 September 2014;
2. It is noted that statement of claim has already been filed on 20 April 2018;
3. Those portions of the defendant's defence comprising paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, 11 and the word "Injury" appearing in paragraph 7, are struck out;
4. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion filed on 2 July 2018;
5. The exhibits may be returned;
6. Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further or other orders are required. Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – application by plaintiff pursuant to s 151D of Workers' Compensation Act 1987 – whether service of plaintiff's pre-filing statement was validly served by email on solicitor representing the defendant and its insurer Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, s 67 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 10.5, r 10.6 Workers' Compensation Act 1987, s 74, s 151D, s 151DA Workers' Compensation Commission Rules 2011, r 1.4, r 1.6, r 8.2, r 8.3, r 8.4, r 17.3 Workplace Injury Management and Workers' Compensation Act 1998, s 4, s 281, s 282, s 311, s 313, s 315, s 315(1), s 316, s 317, s 318 Cases Cited: Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon [2006] HCA 32; (2006) 225 CLR 364 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541 Bull v Attorney General (NSW) [1913] HCA 60; (1913) 17 CLR 370 Commonwealth of Australia v Shaw [2006] NSWCA 209; (2006) 66 NSWLR 325 Department of Corrective Services v Mitchelson (1992) 26 NSWLR 648 Esso Australia Pty Ltd v The Australian Workers' Union (2017) 92 ALJR 106 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Gower v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 132 Hall v Jones (1942) 42 SR(NSW) 203 Holt v Wynter [2000] NSWCA 143; (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Howley v Principal Health Care Finance Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 447 Itex Graphix Ltd v Elliott [2002] NSWCA 104; (2002) 54 NSWLR 207 Paper Coaters Pty Limited v Jessop [2009] NSWCA 1 Repatriation Commission v Hawkins (1993) 117 ALR 225 Salvation Army (South Australia Property Trust) v Randle [2008] NSWCA 347 Sea Coatings (Australia) Pty Ltd v Pascoe [2008] NSWCA 54 Smith v Grant [2006] NSWCA 244 Strasburger Enterprises Pty Ltd trading as Quix Food Stores v Serna [2008] NSWCA 354 Tokyo Mart Pty Ltd v Campbell (1988) 15 NSWLR 275 X v Commonwealth of Australia [1999] HCA 63; (1999) 200 CLR 177 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Gunther Van Der Borght (Plaintiff/Applicant) Memjet North Ryde Pty Limited (Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Roberts SC with Mr P Menary (Plaintiff) Mr F Doak (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate