NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pacific Shoji Pty Ltd v Xia [2018] NSWCA 290 Hearing dates: 27 June 2018 Decision date: 28 November 2018 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [123] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed in part.
2. Set aside the judgment in favour of Ms Xia on her claim in the amount of $268,739.14 plus interest in the amount of $52,926.17 dated 31 August 2017, and in lieu thereof, enter judgment in favour of Ms Xia in the amount of $210,767.73 plus interest, with effect from 31 August 2017.
3. Direct the parties to file and serve, within 7 days, an agreed calculation of interest, or their separate calculations of interest, for the purposes of order 2 above.
4. Pacific Shoji to pay 60% of Ms Xia's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACT – damages for repayment of loan – whether primary judge erred in finding that money paid by plaintiff to defendant was by way of loan – held primary judge erred in finding money was lent to defendant
CONTRACT – damages for failure to pay commission – primary judge found informal agreement for payment of 10% commission if plaintiff could find buyer for defendant's factory – whether sufficient evidence to sustain findings – whether commission payable in circumstances where sale not achieved until employee's contract terminated – whether appellant permitted to run different case on appeal – appellant precluded from running new case on appeal
EMPLOYMENT – contract of employment – whether employee sold goods on credit to other customers – employee concealed fact from employer – whether breach of contract – whether employer entitled to damages for unpaid price of those goods – held breach established, but employer failed to establish breach had caused any loss Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Justice Legislation Amendment Act (No 3) 2018 (NSW), Schedule 1 Cases Cited: Australian Wholesale Meats (Sydney) v S&R Cool Logistics Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1541 Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell [2000] HCA 64; 75 ALJR 312 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 219 Moneywood Pty Ltd v Salamon Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 202 CLR 351; [2001] HCA 2 Xia v Pacific Shoji Pty Ltd [2017] NSWDC 161 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pacific Shoji Pty Ltd (Appellant) Helen Rong Xia (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D A Lloyd (Appellant) Steven Sher (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate