NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Burge v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 275 Hearing dates: 18 September, 23 October 2018 Date of orders: 28 November 2018 Decision date: 28 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Leal, Senior Member Decision: The decision of the respondent on 4 January 2018 to refuse the applicant a Prohibited Weapon (Silencer) Permit is affirmed Catchwords: FIREARMS LICENSING – prohibited weapon - silencer - genuine reason – meaning of word "required" – whether vermin control is a genuine reason contemplated by the Act - whether silencer required for recreational/sporting purpose – decision affirmed. Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Allen [2016] NSWCATAP 148 Larsson v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAP 149 Marando v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAP 29 Osborne v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service (GD) [2000] NSWADTAP 10 Thompson v Judge Byrne (1999) 196 CLR 141. Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mitchell Lee Burge (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H El-Hage (Respondent)
Solicitors: Hartmann & Associates (Applicant) Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00022351 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate