NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fantakis [2018] NSWSC 1815 Hearing dates: 22 February 2018 Date of orders: 26 February 2018 Decision date: 26 February 2018 Before: Wilson J Decision: Application to exclude evidence of admissions made by the accused is refused Catchwords: CRIME – accused charged with murder – objection taken to admissibility of admissions made by accused in diary notes and video recordings – reliability of admissions – mental illness – capacity of jury to determine reliability of admissions that may be delusional - s 90 Evidence Act – question of unfair prejudice Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63; 81 NSWLR 568 Em v The Queen [2007] HCA 46; 232 CLR 67 Imm v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 Pfennig v The Queen [1995] HCA 7; 182 CLR 461 Poniris v R [2014] NSWCCA 100 R v Fantakis; R v Woods [2017] NSWSC 1840 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306; 201 A Crim R 451 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112; 66 NSWLR 228 R v Swaffield; Pavic v R [1998] HCA 1; (1998) 192 CLR 159 R v Woods; R v Cheong [2018] NSWSC 123 R v XY [2013] NSWCCA 121 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Crown Accused - Elefterios [Terry] FANTAKIS Representation: Counsel: Mr L Lungo as Crown Prosecutor Mr I Todd for the accused Fantakis
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate