NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BB Australia v Danset (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 1823 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 29 November 2018 Decision date: 29 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 9 October 2017 dismissed with costs. Catchwords: COSTS – application to vary costs order – whether alleged "misconduct" of the fourth and fifth defendants should disentitle those parties to a costs order – where misconduct was part of the plaintiff's case against those parties which failed – no reason to depart from the usual order as to costs. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: BB Australia Pty Ltd v Danset Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1307 BB Australia Pty Ltd v Danset Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 101 BB Australia v Danset (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1745 Emerald Construction Co v Lowthian [1966] 1 WLR 691 Short v City Bank (1912) 12 SR (NSW) 186 Category: Costs Parties: BB Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Danset Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Jorge Manuel Simoes Miraldo (Second Defendant) Maria Graca Samagaio Miraldo (Third Defendant) Tresblue Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) John Kevin Price (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Herzfield (Plaintiff) J A Darvall (Fourth and Fifth Defendants)
Solicitors: Macpherson Kelley Lawyers (Plaintiff) Paul Mattick & Associates (Fourth and Fifth Defendants) File Number(s): 2016/94570
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate