NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kocyigit v R [2018] NSWCCA 279 Hearing dates: 28 November 2018 Date of orders: 07 December 2018 Decision date: 07 December 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Bellew J at [2] Campbell J at [39] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Appeal – Robbery inflicting actual bodily harm – Where applicant and co-offender assaulted and robbed a member of the public – Serious injuries inflicted to the victim – Relevance of applicant's mental state in determining sentence – Relevance of applicant's youth – Objectively serious offending – Whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alkanaan v R [2017] NSWCCA 56 Azzi v R [2008] NSWCCA 169 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De la Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Hili v R: Jones v R [2010] HCA 45 JM v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 55; [2012] NSWCCA 83 KT v R (2008) 182 A Crim R 571; [2008] NSWCCA 51 Mansour v R; Hughes v R [2013] NSWCCA 35 McDonald v R [2015] NSWCCA 280 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Tuuta [2014] NSWCCA 40 R v Woods [1990] NSWCCA 9 October 1990 Vaeila v R [2010] NSWCCA 113 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Zhao v R [2016] NSWCCA 179 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mehmet Kocyigit – Applicant Regina - Crown Representation: Counsel: S Kluss – Applicant E Balodis - Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate