NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v Drumm (No. 2) [2018] NSWSC 1853 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 05 December 2018 Decision date: 05 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: I vary the costs order made by me on 27 August 2018 as follows:
The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs in the sum of $35,000. Catchwords: COSTS – party/party – whether appropriate to make order for specified gross sum instead of assessed costs – application by defendant after appeal from Local Court dismissed – Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98(4)(c) – where costs of both proceedings were disproportionate to amount in issue – where unnecessary costs were incurred due to conduct of plaintiff – where costs owed by plaintiff to defendant and defendants' solicitors pursuant to previous orders were unpaid – where plaintiff impecunious – factors relevant to court's discretion when quantifying discount on established costs – order made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 60, 98 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) pt 52A r 6(2) Cases Cited: Attorney General in and for the State of NSW v Bar-Mordecai [2013] NSWSC 1307 Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bechara trading as Bechara and Company v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Bobb v Wombat Securities Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 863 Coshott v Parker (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1195 Gupta v Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 694 Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 13) [2009] NSWSC 756 Hamod v State of New South Wales and Anor [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213; Huang v Drumm [2018] NSWSC 1300 Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited & Ors, Idoport Pty Limited v Donald Robert Argus [2007] NSWSC 23 Kostov v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No.1) [2018] NSWSC 1822 Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4) [2013] NSWSC 811 Stankovic v State of NSW (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 335 Young v Hones (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 499 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 99 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Biru Huang (Plaintiff) Bernard Joseph Drumm (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) & Mr J Gibson (Mackenzie friend) D F Elliot (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate