NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GG v R [2018] NSWCCA 280 Hearing dates: 7 November 2018 Date of orders: 07 December 2018 Decision date: 07 December 2018 Before: Payne JA at [1] Schmidt J at [14] Fagan J at [144] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – leave to appeal and appeal against sentence – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to have regard to standard non parole periods – error conceded – whether some other sentence warranted in law – objective seriousness of the offences – effect of evidence of prior good character and lack of record – how Form 1 offence to be taken into account –consideration of victim impact statement which deals with circumstances for which applicant was not responsible – special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 66C, 66C(4), 66EB(3), 91H(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A(3), 21A(3)(e), 21A(3)(f), 21A(5A), 21A(6), 32, 54A(2), 54B(7) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115; (2013) 231 A Crim R 413 Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 DL v The Queen [2018] HCA 32; (2018) 92 ALJR 764 Josefski v R [2010] NSWCCA 41; (2010) 217 A Crim R 183 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623; [1974] HCA 26 R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370; (2005) 162 A Crim R 29 R v Hutchinson [2018] NSWCCA 152 R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209; (2000) 112 A Crim R 466 R v Kaliti [2001] NSWCCA 268 R v PGM [2008] NSWCCA 172; (2008) 187 A Crim R 152 R v Porte [2015] NSWCCA 174 R v Wilkinson (No 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 RWB v R [2010] NSWCCA 147; (2010) 202 A Crim R 209 Siganto v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 656; [1998] HCA 74 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 Thammavongsa v R (2015) 251 A Crim R 342; [2015] NSWCCA 107 Wakeling v R [2016] NSWCCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GG (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr G James QC with Mr D Marr (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate