NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: New South Wales Crime Commission v Nguyen [2018] NSWSC 1858 Hearing dates: 26 November 2018 Date of orders: 26 November 2018 Decision date: 26 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Pursuant to section 12(1)(b1) of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990, Thi Hue Nguyen be examined on oath before a Registrar of the Court concerning the affairs of Thi Hue Nguyen, including the nature and location of any property in which Thi Hue Nguyen has an interest; leave is granted to the plaintiff to obtain from the Registry dates for the examinations order in Order 1; that the Crime Commission arrange and meet the expense of a Vietnamese interpreter to assist Mrs Nguyen at the examination. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – proceedings for confiscation of property – application to examine spouse of defendant on oath concerning affairs of the defendant – appropriateness of ordering the Crime Commission to provide and bear costs of interpreter Legislation Cited: Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW), s 12(1)(b1) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: New South Wales Crime Commission (plaintiff) Van Thuong Nguyen (defendant) Thi Hue Nguyen (interested party) Representation: Counsel:
S Santhikumar (solicitor for plaintiff) (ex parte application) Thi Hue Nguyen (interested party) (self represented)
Solicitors: New South Wales Crime Commission (plaintiff) File Number(s): 2016/312220 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate