NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cai v Tsang (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1860 Hearing dates: 3 December 2018 Date of orders: 03 December 2018 Decision date: 04 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $4,289,593.60. (2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – context – plaintiff lender to company over which defendant was director – where contract included personal guarantee by defendant – where contract also included undertakings by company to procure unregistered mortgages over properties owned by defendant's wife and daughter-in-law – where defendant's wife and daughter-in-law not parties to loan agreement – whether procurement of unregistered mortgages condition precedent to personal guarantee – no condition precedent in contract as construed – judgment for plaintiff
GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY – contract of guarantee – co-guarantors – where loan agreement included undertakings by debtor company to procure unregistered mortgages over properties owned by director defendant's wife and daughter-in-law – whether wife and daughter-in-law co-guarantors – whether liability of defendant as personal guarantor excluded by non-signature of alleged co-guarantors to loan agreement and/or failure to procure unregistered mortgages over alleged co-guarantors' property Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Cases Cited: CARS Pty Ltd v Brent [2015] TASSC 23 James Graham and Co (Timber) Ltd v Southgate-Sands [1986] QB 80 Keith Murphy Pty Ltd v Custom Credit Corporation Limited (1992) 6 WAR 332 Marston v Charles H Griffith & Co Pty Ltd (1982) 3 NSWLR 294 Re Farm Pride Foods Ltd [1999] QSC 174 Taubmans Pty Ltd v Loakes [1991] 2 Qd R 109 Texts Cited: David Marks and Gabriel Moss, Rowlatt on Principal and Surety (4th ed, 1982, Sweet and Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Weiming Cai (plaintiff) Andrew Tsang (defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Gration (plaintiff) J Cameron, solicitor (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate