NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd v Documents on Call Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1862 Hearing dates: 3 December 2018 Date of orders: 05 December 2018 Decision date: 05 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Notice of motion dismissed with costs Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – cross-vesting – transfer to other Supreme Court – where non-exclusive jurisdiction clause Legislation Cited: Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW), s 5 Cases Cited: Asciano Services Pty Ltd v Australian Rail Track Corp Ltd [2008] NSWSC 652 BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400; [2004] HCA 61 James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry (2000) 50 NSWLR 357; [2000] NSWCA 353 Patrick Badges Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia [2002] NSWSC 221 Taurus Funds Management Pty Ltd v Aurox Resources Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1223 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Respondent) Documents on Call Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Applicant) Kevin James Mack (Second Defendant/Applicant) Mary Denise Mack (Third Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: D F Elliott (Plaintiff/Respondent) G S J Berlic (Defendants/Applicants)
Solicitors: Gillis Delaney Lawyers (Plaintiff/Respondent) Wisewould Mahony Lawyers (Defendants/Applicants) File Number(s): 2018/258941 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate