NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sayers v Sayers [2018] NSWCA 301 Hearing dates: 25 October 2018 Date of orders: 10 December 2018 Decision date: 10 December 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Emmett AJA at [2]; Simpson AJA at [96] Decision: Appeal dismissed. The appellants pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, including costs of the notice of motion of 22 October 2018. Catchwords: EQUITY – respondent is Toni, the wife of the first appellant's brother – first appellant and his deceased brother held equal shares in a property as tenants in common – on brother's death, title in the property was transmitted to the respondent – first appellant and respondent could not agree on sale of the property and first appellant brought proceedings under the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G for the appointment of trustees for sale – trustees were appointed and property was sold at public auction to first appellant and his wife, the second appellant – dispute arose regarding entitlement to the proceeds of sale and the payment of mortgage and sale expenses – respondent claimed that sum in discharge of mortgage was impermissibly deducted from her sale proceeds – first appellant then brought claim relying on contract and promissory estoppel alleging that his deceased brother had promised that the property would pass to the first appellant's sons, the third and fourth appellants, on his death – primary judge found that respondent's claim was made out – primary judge dismissed the first appellant's contract and estoppel claim – whether primary judge erred in certain factual findings Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ashton v Pratt [2015] NSWCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Keith James Sayers (First Appellant) Inesita Sayers (Second Appellant) George Sayers (Third Appellant) Neil Sayers (Fourth Appellant) Toni Sayers (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G W McGrath with C P Locke (Appellants) D Robertson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate