NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v International Oils Machinery (Aust) Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 380 Hearing dates: 9 November 2018 Date of orders: 10 December 2018 Decision date: 10 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: 1 The offender is convicted. 2 I impose a fine of $15,000. 3 I order pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor. 4 The offender is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CRIME – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – duty of employers – risk of serious injury – worker injured SENTENCING – aggravating factors – mitigating factors – objective seriousness – general deterrence – specific deterrence – substantial harm, injury, loss or damage – victim impact statement – no record of previous convictions – good prospects of rehabilitation – plea of guilty – assistance to law enforcement authorities – remorse – capacity to pay a fine WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY – physical safety measure circumvented – safe work method statement not updated to reflect risk COSTS – prosecution costs OTHER – bale press machine modified in violation of lease agreement to allow easier access to unguarded moving parts – worker's finger caught between moving wires – arm dragged into machine – permanent injuries to hand and arm Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Fines Act 1996 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37 Jahandideh v R [2014] NSWCCA 178 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Tuala [2015] NSWCCA 8 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412 Texts Cited: Australian Standard 4024.1201:2014 Safety of machinery - General principles for design - Risk assessment and risk reduction Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecution) International Oils Machinery (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Docking (Prosecution) Ms M Hammond (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate