NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tasoulas v Tasoulas [2018] NSWCA 309 Hearing dates: 2 October 2018 Decision date: 13 December 2018 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Payne JA at [57]; White JA at [58] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal from the judgment and orders made in the Equity Division.
(2) Order that the appellant pay the respondent's costs in this Court. Catchwords: LAND LAW – fraud – appellant alleged his signature was forged on transfer of half-share in property to his mother – primary judge found appellant had signed transfer – whether trial judge misunderstood evidence regarding transcripts of telephone conversations between appellant and his sister – whether trial judge impermissibly refused to admit evidence – whether self-represented litigant's experience with former solicitors provided basis for overturning decision below – whether self-represented litigant's fatigue in cross-examination provided basis for overturning decision below Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 131 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Tasoulas (Appellant) Vasiliki Tasoulas (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Appellant Self-represented C Wood / J Wyner (Respondent)
Solicitors: Appellant Self-represented Colquhoun & Colquhoun (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/170976 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2018] NSWSC 861 Date of Decision: 17 May 2018 Before: Rein J File Number(s): 2017/258803
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate