NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Muriniti; Newell v Lawcover Insurance Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 311 Hearing dates: 19 June 2018 Decision date: 14 December 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ; Beazley P; White JA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – policy of professional indemnity insurance – whether on the proper construction of the policy the appellants were deemed to have consented to Lawcover's decision not to appeal the decision in Young v King (No 11) – whether on the proper construction of the policy the appellants were entitled to bring an appeal in their own names
CONTRACTS – construction – good faith – whether Lawcover acted in bad faith in defending the proceeding subject of Young v King (No 11) - whether Lawcover acted in bad faith in refusing to appeal from the decision in Young v King (No 11)
INSURANCE – Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) – duty of good faith – whether clauses in professional indemnity insurance policy contravened Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), s 52 – whether the policy offended the good faith provisions of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
APPEALS – failure to give reasons – whether the primary judge failed to give adequate reasons for his conclusion that Lawcover had not failed to act in good faith
APPEALS – apprehended bias – whether the reasons of the primary judge supported a reasonable apprehension of bias Legislation Cited: Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW), s 4 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 98, 99 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 91 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), ss 13, 14, 52 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), Sch 2, cl 5 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(10) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51 Cases Cited: Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418; [1996] HCA 39 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99; [1973] HCA 36 Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Dalgety Wine Estates Pty Ltd v Rizzon (1979) 141 CLR 552; [1979] HCA 41 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Flinn v Flinn (1999) 3 VR 712; [1999] VSCA 109 Gan Insurance Co v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1047; [2001] 2 All ER (Comm) 299 Hancock Family Memorial Foundation Ltd v Lowe (2015) 320 ALR 337; [2015] WASCA 38 King v Muriniti (2018) 359 ALR 291; [2018] NSWCA 98 Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 300; [2005] NSWCA 153 Logwon Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 33 NSWLR 13 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Aust Pty Ltd (2001) 210 CLR 181; [2001] HCA 70 McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579; [2000] HCA 65 Michael Wilson & Partners v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Newell; Muriniti v De Costi [2018] NSWCA 49 Orleans Investments Pty Ltd v MindShare Communications Ltd (2009) 254 ALR 81; [2009] NSWCA 40 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900; [2011] UKSC 50 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 Romeo v Papalia [2012] NSWCA 221 Royal Guardian Mortgage Management Pty Ltd v Nguyen (2016) 332 ALR 128; [2016] NSWCA 88 Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Symphony Group plc v Hodgson [1994] QB 179 at 193 TAL Life Ltd v Shuetrim; Metlife Insurance Ltd v Shuetrim (2016) 91 NSWLR 439; [2016] NSWCA 68 West Wake Price & Co v Ching [1957] 1 WLR 45 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff (2005) 221 CLR 522; [2005] HCA 17 Young v King (No 11) [2017] NSWLEC 34 Young v King (No 4) [2012] NSWLEC 236 Young v King (No 6) [2015] NSWLEC 111 Young v King (No 7) [2015] NSWLEC 178 Young v King (No 8) [2015] NSWLEC 187 Young v King (No 9) [2016] NSWLEC 4 Young v King [2016] NSWCA 282 Zhang v ROC Services (NSW) Pty Ltd; National Transport Insurance by its manager NTI Ltd v Zhang (2016) 93 NSWLR 561; [2016] NSWCA 370 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leonardo Carlo Muriniti (First Appellant) Robert Duane Newell (Second Appellant) Lawcover Insurance Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Newell (Appellants) G Rich SC; A Zahra (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate