NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wykes v MS & SJ Schols Pty Ltd; MS & SJ Schols Pty Ltd v Wykes [2018] NSWCATCD 50 Hearing dates: 22, 23 March 2017, 14, 21-23 August 2017; written submissions 21 August 2017, 20 November 2017, 12 January 2018, 2 February 2018 Date of orders: 30 August 2018 Decision date: 30 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: L Pearson, Principal Member Decision: (1) In proceedings HB 15/65625 and HB 17/05296, Shannon John Wykes and Shannon Leigh Wykes are to pay MS & SJ Schols Pty Ltd the amount of $251,551.76 within 28 days of the date of these orders;
(2) Proceedings HB 15/65625 and HB 17/05296 are otherwise dismissed;
(3) Either party may file written submissions within 14 days seeking an order in relation to the costs of the proceedings;
(4) If either party files submissions in accordance with order (3), the other party may file submissions in response within a further 14 days;
(5) Any submissions filed in accordance with orders (3) and (4) should address whether the question of costs may be determined on the papers and without a hearing pursuant to s50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. Catchwords: HOME BUILDING – residential building work – contract – whether fixed price or cost plus – whether written or oral – hybrid arrangement – whether sham – terms of contract – builder's defects – quantum meruit Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Home Building Act 1989 Home Building Regulation 2014 Cases Cited: ABB Engineering Construction Pty Limited v Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 665 Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Beckhaus v Brewarrina (No 2) [2004] NSWSC 1160 Bradshaw v Complete Coating Commercial Pty Ltd t/as CCC Civil [2017] NSWCATAP 209 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Eddy Lau Constructions Pty Ltd v Transdevelopment Enterprise Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 273 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11.110 Kriketos v Livschitz [2009] NSWCA 96 Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd v Marsden [2018] NSWCATAP 23 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 Pickersgill v Tsoukalas [2009] SASC 357 Raftland Pty Ltd as trustee of the Raftland Trust v Commissioner of Taxation [2008] HCA 21; (2008) 238 CLR 516 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620; [1982] HCA 47 Sopov & Anor v Kane Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2)[2009] VSCA 141 Tsoukalas v Pickersgill & Harvey [2008] SADC 32 Texts Cited: Mason K and Carter JW, Mason & Carters Restitution Law in Australia, Third Edition, LexisNexis Butterworths, Sydney, 2016 Category: Principal judgment Parties: HB 15/65625: Shannon John and Shannon Leigh Wykes (Applicants) MS & SJ Schols Pty Ltd (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate