NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sakellis v Vourlos [2018] NSWSC 1928 Hearing dates: 13 December 2018 Date of orders: 19 December 2018 Decision date: 19 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Dismiss the plaintiff's amended notice of motion filed 13 December 2018.
(2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the motion. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – summary disposal – judgment for plaintiff – striking out of defence sought in the alternative – whether no reasonable defence – where defendant relied on proprietary estoppel to defend proceedings for possession of real property – whether evidence capable of establishing detrimental reliance –necessary to make findings about representations and availability of relief sought by defendant at trial – no basis for summary disposal or striking out Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 14.28 Cases Cited: Bushby v Dixon Holmes Du Pont Pty Ltd (2010) 78 NSWLR 111; [2010] NSWSC 234 Simmons v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 405 Sullivan v Sullivan [2006] NSWCA 312 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Angela Sakellis (Plaintiff) Constantinos Vourlos (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Young (Plaintiff) T Liu (Defendant)
Solicitors: Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Plaintiff) Clayton Utz (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/177144 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate