NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zaps Transport (Aust) Pty Limited v Richland Express Pty Limited [2018] NSWSC 1930 Hearing dates: 30 – 31 October 2018 and 1 November 2018 Date of orders: 13 December 2018 Decision date: 13 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: Further amended Statement of Claim dismissed with costs. Catchwords: COMMERCE — Customs and excise — Customs duties — Plaintiff served with notice of statutory demand under Customs Act 1901 (Cth) s 35A for amount payable on stolen dutiable goods — Plaintiff operated licensed Warehouse for dutiable goods in respect of Part V of Customs Act — Whether Defendant had contractual obligation to insure dutiable goods in event of statutory demand and pay proceeds of insurance to Plaintiff as recipient of demand — Insurer refused to pay demand because Plaintiff not covered by contract of insurance — Whether Defendant had knowledge that Plaintiff had assumed management of Warehouse
CONTRACTS — Formation — Novation — Whether Plaintiff was substituted into contract between Defendant and original Warehouse licensee — Requirements for effective novation of contract by substitution of party — Whether effective novation where Defendant had no knowledge that Plaintiff assumed the place of third party — Relevance of intention for effective novation — Whether new contract was formed when Defendant continued to use Warehouse after learning it was managed by Plaintiff — Whether any agreement evidenced by conduct
CONTRACTS — Whether adoption of contract that had previously existed between Defendant and another entity Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Customs Tariff Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 13) (2011) 86 ACSR 174; [2011] FCA 1151 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424; [2001] FCA 1833 Buchanan v Sirocco Area Leases Ltd (2008) 20 PRNZ 256 (HC); [2008] NZHC 766 CEO of Customs v John Deere Limited (2006) 155 FCR 208; [2006] FCA 1280 Cherry v Steele-Park (2017) 96 NSWLR 548; [2017] NSWCA 295 Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Tony Longo Pty Ltd (2001) 52 NSWLR 458; [2001] NSWCA 147 Comptroller General of Customs v Zappia [2018] HCA 54 Comptroller General of Customs v Zappia [2018] HCATrans 140 Comptroller General of Customs v Zappia [2018] HCATrans 51 Dan v Barclays Australia Ltd (1983) 46 ALR 437 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Fightvision Pty Ltd v Onisforou (1999) 47 NSWLR 473; [1999] NSWCA 323 Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd v Park Cho Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 282 Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd v Park Cho Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 528 Goben Pty Ltd v The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (No 2) (1996) 68 FCR 301 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 New Galaxy Investments Pty Ltd v Thomson [2017] NSWCA 153 Pearce v Coynes Freight Management Group Pty Ltd (2010) 183 FCR 540; [2010] FCA 320 Re Zaps Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd and Comptroller General of Customs [2017] AATA 202 Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan's Merchandise (Vic) Pty Ltd (1957) 98 CLR 93; [1957] HCA 10 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling & Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429; [1968] HCA 8 Westpac Banking Corp v Tanzone Pty Ltd (2000) 9 BPR 17,521; [2000] NSWCA 25 Zappia v Comptroller General of Customs (2017) 254 FCR 363; [2017] FCAFC 147 Texts Cited: H G Beale (ed), Chitty on Contracts (29th ed, 2004, Sweet and Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zaps Transport (AUST) Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Richland Express Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Hall (solicitor) (Plaintiff) Mr S C Ipp (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate