NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lelikan [2018] NSWSC 1933 Hearing dates: 16 October 2018 Date of orders: 16 October 2018 Decision date: 17 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: The Crown's tender of MFI 10 is rejected
Publication of reasons for declining to order the accused to enter the dock and instead allowing him to take a seat on the floor of the court Catchwords: CRIME – evidence – trial for engaging in a hostile activity in a foreign state (Turkey and Iraq) – admissibility of documents tending to show that the accused had fled from France whilst on bail several years earlier
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – trial judge's unfettered discretion as to whether to order the accused to enter the dock or allow him to remain on the floor of the court and to sit down – no requirement for accused to establish a need to depart from any usual approach or to establish something "exceptional" about his or her trial Legislation Cited: Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978 (Cth), ss 6(1)(a), 6(1)(b) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 34 Evidence Act 2005 (NSW), s 137 Cases Cited: R v Stephen (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 167 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Renas Lelikan (Accused) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: P McGuire SC with R Ranken (Crown) P Boulten SC (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Younes + Espiner Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2016/219466 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate