NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mulholland v R [2018] NSWCCA 299 Hearing dates: 7 November 2018 Date of orders: 19 December 2018 Decision date: 19 December 2018 Before: Payne JA at [1], Schmidt J at [126], Fagan J at [131] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted; (2) Appeal allowed; (3) Set aside the appellant's conviction; (4) Remitted to the District Court for re-trial. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – conviction – two counts of sexual intercourse without consent contrary to s 61I of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – whether trial judge's summing up caused a miscarriage of justice – whether summing up unbalanced or unfair Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61I Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6
Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Cases Cited: AP v R [2017] NSWCCA 270 ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599; [1992] HCA 68 Castle v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 449; [2016] HCA 46 Castle v R (2016) 92 NSWLR 17; [2016] NSWCCA 148 Darwiche v R; El-Zeyat v R; Aouad v R; Osman v R [2011] NSWCCA 62 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555; [1992] HCA 13 Germakian v R (2007) 70 NSWLR 467; [2007] NSWCCA 373 Green v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 28; [1971] HCA 55 Huynh v The Queen [2013] HCA 6; (2013) 228 A Crim R 306 Majok v R [2015] NSWCCA 160 Odisho v R [2018] NSWCCA 19 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Courtney-Smith (No 2) (1990) 48 A Crim R 49 R v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36; (2017) 91 ALJR 960 R v Heuston (1995) 81 A Crim R 387 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v RTB [2002] NSWCCA 104 R v Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 54 R v Williams (1990) 50 A Crim R 213 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192; (2006) 162 A Crim R 88 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Tekely v R; Nagle v R [2007] NSWCCA 75 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657; [1983] HCA 42 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Mulholland (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Applicant) C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate