NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Spedding v Dailymail.com Australia Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1963 Hearing dates: 23 November 2018, 12 December 2018 Decision date: 14 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: That the limitation period for bringing an action on the causes of action for defamation pleaded in pars 3, 7 and 11 of the statement of claim filed 22 March 2018 be extended to 22 March 2018; that the plaintiff's notice of motion filed 1 May 2018 otherwise be dismissed. Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – general – application of statutes of limitation – action for defamation – imputation that the plaintiff is a convicted paedophile – where plaintiff facing criminal charges for sexual offences against children at time of publication – advice obtained from senior and junior counsel that no defamation claim should be pursued prior to conclusion of criminal proceedings – whether "not reasonable test" satisfied Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 56A Cases Cited: Barrett v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 304 Houda v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWSC 1036 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: William Spedding (plaintiff) Dailymail.com Australia Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Goodchild then T Molomby SC (plaintiff) S Chrysanthou (defendant)
Solicitors: O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Mark O'Brien Legal (defendant) File Number(s): 2018/91447 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate