NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Mark A Fraser and Christopher P Clancy trading as Fraser Clancy Lawyers (No 3) [2018] NSWCA 326 Hearing dates: 10 December 2018 Decision date: 18 December 2018 Before: Leeming JA Decision: 1. Dismiss summons filed 8 November 2018. 2. Applicants to pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: PRACTICE – extension of time – judicial review proceedings – proceedings commenced years after decision – no basis for extension of time made out Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 59.10 Cases Cited: Gallo v Dawson [1990] HCA 30; (1990) 64 ALJR 458 Katter v Melhem (2015) 90 NSWLR 164; [2015] NSWCA 213 Lawrence Lin v Ian Borrowdale [2011] NSWCA 65 Nicholls v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 141 Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Mark A Fraser & Christopher P Clancy t/as Fraser Clancy Lawyers [2014] NSWCA 454 Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Mark A Fraser and Christopher P Clancy trading as Fraser Clancy Lawyers [2018] NSWCA 53 Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Mark A Fraser and Christopher P Clancy t/as Fraser Clancy Lawyers [2018] NSWCA 186 Tagget v Sexton [2009] NSWCA 91; (2009) 255 ALR 522 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Riva NSW Pty Ltd (First Applicant) Angelo Ferella (Second Applicant) Tiziana Ferella (Third Applicant) Mark A Fraser and Christopher P Clancy trading as Fraser Clancy Lawyers (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate