NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Peter Gavranich [No 1] [2018] NSWDC 401 Hearing dates: 3 December 2018 Date of orders: 03 December 2018 Decision date: 03 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: The application to file the fresh indictment is allowed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULING – Fresh indictments – ex officio indictment – ex officio indictment after guilty plea to an original count – implied admissions – accused "snookered" – before an ex officio indictment – procedural fairness – stay considered – leave consideration – prejudice and injustice – leave granted. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Barton v The Queen [1980] HCA 48; (1980) 147 CLR 75 Borodin v R [2006] NSWCCA 83 Di Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 Houlten v R (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Jago v The District Court of New South Wales [1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1999) 194 CLR 610 Strickland v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2018] HCA 53 X7 v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 273 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Peter Gavranich (Offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr Z Khan (For the offender) Ms G Steedman (Solicitor Advocate for the Director of Public Prosecutions)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate