NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Peter Gavranich [No 2] (Verdict) [2018] NSWDC 402 Hearing dates: 3 December 2018, 4 December 2018, 5 December 2018 Date of orders: 06 December 2018 Decision date: 06 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Decision of (1) Not guilty specially aggravated break enter and intimidate with dangerous weapon (2) Guilty of aggravated break enter and intimidate knowing person present. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – break and enter circumstances of special aggravation – armed with a dangerous weapon; a rifle – trial by Judge alone – assessing witnesses – an intimidating video message – a threat with a rifle at 2:23AM – no rifle on Police search at 3:15AM – some evidence not disputed – a toxic relationship – disputed evidence – break – dangerous weapon at 6:00AM – an incident at Fairy Meadow – two conflicting versions – accused version rejects – concerns with aspects of complainant's account – belief on balance is not proof beyond reasonable doubt – reason to doubt rifle at Fairy Meadow – no reason to doubt other aspects of complainant's account – prosecution onus – lingering doubt – dangerous weapon present – Accused must have benefit of the doubt – no doubt alternative count Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Firearms Act 1996 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Barton v The Queen [1980] HCA 48; (1980) 147 CLR 75 Borodin v R [2006] NSWCCA 83 Di Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 Houlten v R (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Jago v The District Court of New South Wales [1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen, (1999) 194 CLR 610 Strickland v Director of Public Prosecutions (C'th) [2018] HCA 53 X7 v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 273 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 R v Jovanovic (1997) 42 NSWLR 520 RB v R [2016] NSWCCA 62 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Gavranich (Offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr Z Khan (For the offender) Ms G Steedman (Solicitor Advocate for the Director of Public Prosecutions)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate