NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pearson v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 295 Hearing dates: 11 April 2018, 19 June 2018 Date of orders: 19 December 2018 Decision date: 19 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: The Reviewable decision is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - FIREARMS – public interest – whether a risk to public safety – mental illness – licensing and registration scheme – genuine reason. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2013 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSW ADTAP 9 Constantin v Commission of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service, [2001] NSW ADT 50 Davos v Commissioner of Police [2013] NSWADT 7 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179; (1979) 46 FLR 409 Lynch v Commissioner of Police (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 43 Martin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2010] NSWADT 276 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSW ADT 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Douglas William Pearson (Applicant) Commissioner for Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Applicant in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate