State of New South Wales v Rogers (Final) [2018] NSWSC 1988

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Rogers (Final) [2018] NSWSC 1988 Hearing dates: 10 December 2018 Date of orders: 19 December 2018 Decision date: 19 December 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: In the circumstances, I consider the requirements of s 5B have been satisfied and pursuant to s 9(1)(a) of the Act an extended supervision order should be made effective from 19 December 2018 for a period of 3 years. Further, I consider that pursuant to s 11 of the Act, the conditions set out in Amended Schedule A to the amended summons should apply and the defendant should be directed to comply with those conditions.

The State should bring in short minutes of order reflecting this judgment by 4pm on 20 December 2018. Catchwords: CIVIL – application pursuant to the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – serious sex offence – application for extended supervision order – whether the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence – consideration of factors in s 9 – extended supervision order made for 3 years – conditions imposed – directions Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Farringdon [2018] NSWSC 874 State of New South Wales v Golding (Final) [2018] NSWSC 1437 State of New South Wales v Holloway (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1517 State of New South Wales v Kaiser (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 1971 State of New South Wales v Rogers [2018] NSWSC 1314 State of New South Wales v Strudwick [2018] NSWSC 1798 State of New South Wales v TT (Final) [2018] NSWSC 358 State of NSW v Carr [2014] NSWSC 1348 State of NSW v Weribone [2016] NSWSC 1474 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Darren Clarence Rogers (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I Fraser (Plaintiff) S Hall (Defendant)