NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Webber v Comcare (No. 2) [2018] NSWDDT 12 Hearing dates: 14 December 2018 Date of orders: 20 December 2018 Decision date: 20 December 2018 Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the plaintiff's application for indemnity costs. (2) Order each party to pay his or its own costs of the further costs application made on 14 December 2018. Catchwords: COSTS – Calderbank offer – whether sufficient time allowed for consideration, having regard to time when crucial evidence was served – whether rejection of the offer was unreasonable given that there was a complex and novel legal issue in the case. Cases Cited: Commonwealth v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 County Securities Pty Limited v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Limited (No. 2) [2008] NSWCA 273 Equity 8 Pty Limited v Shaw Stockbroking Limited [2007] NSWSC 503 Evans Shire Council v Richardson (No. 2) [2006] NSWCA 61 King Network Group Pty Limited v Club of the Clubs Pty Limited (No. 2) MGICA (1992) Pty Limited v Kenny & Good Pty Limited (No. 2) (1996) 70 FCR 236 Nationwide News Pty Limited v Naidu [2007] NSWCA 377; (2007) 71 NSWLR 471 Ofria v Cameron (No. 2) [2008] NSWCA 242 Vale v Eggins (No. 2) [2007] NSWCA 12 Webber v Comcare [2018] NSW DDT 10 Category: Costs Parties: Kevin Webber (Plaintiff) Comcare (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Giurtalis (Plaintiff) G Watson SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate