NSW Caselaw
NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: QXB [2018] NSWCATGD 18 Hearing dates: 6 April 2018 Date of orders: 06 April 2018 Decision date: 06 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: R H Booby, Senior Member (Legal) Dr B McPhee, Senior Member (Professional) F N Given, General Member (Community) Decision: The application for consent to medical treatment is dismissed after hearing.
The application for a Guardianship Order is dismissed because Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network sought to withdraw the application and the Tribunal consented to the withdrawal Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for a guardianship order – standing to bring application – consideration of s 9(1)(d) of the Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) – "genuine concern for the welfare of the person" – consideration of s 21 of the Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) – standing of Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network to bring an application – procedure – procedural fairness and natural justice – notice of hearing as required by s 10 of Guardianship Act – hearing proceeded in absence of subject person – balance between procedural fairness and duty to protect the welfare and the interests of the subject person – reasonable opportunity to be heard – consideration of views of subject person with a disability – application withdrawn
CONSENT TO MEDICAL OR DENTAL TREATMENT – mandatory considerations in s 42(2) of the Guardianship Act – consent refused Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), pt 5; ss 32, 44, 44(3) Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA), s 109(1)(b) Health Services Act 1997 (NSW), s 11 Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW), 68 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), pt 5, s 40 High Court Rules 2016 (NZ), r 66(9) Cases Cited: Minister for Conservation McCully v Whangamata Marina Society Inc and Anor [2006] NZCA 209 (11 August 2006) MZT [2018] NSWCATGD 8 Onus v Alcoa Of Australia Ltd [1981] HCA 50; (1981) 149 CLR 27 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: 009: Guardianship Application
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate