NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Hollis [2019] NSWCATOD 6 Hearing dates: 14, 15 November 2018 Date of orders: 02 January 2019 Decision date: 02 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A P Coleman SC, Senior Member J Flood, Senior Member H Schutz, General Member S Kennedy, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 149C(4)(a) of the National Law order that if the respondent were still registered his registration would have been cancelled; (2) Pursuant to s 149C(4)(b) of the National Law order that the respondent is disqualified from being a registered nurse for 24 months; (3) Pursuant to s 149C(4)(c) of the National Law require the National Board to record the fact that the Tribunal would have cancelled the respondent's registration in the National Register kept by the Board; (4) Pursuant to s 149C(5A) of the National Law order that the respondent is prohibited from working as an Assistant in Nursing and from providing any of the following health services as defined by s 4 of the Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW), whether provided as a public or private service, unless and until he is registered as a nurse: (i) Therapy; (ii) Counselling (iii) Psychotherapy (iv) Hypnotherapy (v) Welfare services (vi) Mental health services (vii) Services provided in other alternative healthcare fields. (5) Pursuant to s 149C(7) of the National Law order that the respondent cannot seek a review of the orders made by the Tribunal for an 18 month period. (6) The Respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROFESSIONS: Registered Nurse- Professional Misconduct, Disqualification and Protective orders made. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) No 86a. Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Chen v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWCA 186 Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186 HCCC v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 HCCC v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630 HCCC v Reid [2018] NSWCATOD162 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Zachary Thomas Hollis (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S J Maybury (Applicant) Mr R Moore (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate